EPYC 7402P
Ryzen 9 5900XT
EPYC 7402P vs Ryzen 9 5900XT Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7402P vs Ryzen 9 5900XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7402P vs Ryzen 9 5900XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7402P
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900XT across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,759 vs 44,105).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.2 vs 126.4 PassMark/$ ($1,280 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900XT
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $931 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 269.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 126.4 vs 34.2 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7402P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900XT better than EPYC 7402P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7402P vs Ryzen 9 5900XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7402P
The EPYC 7402P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,759 points. Launch price was $1,250.
Ryzen 9 5900XT
The Ryzen 9 5900XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 44,105 points. Launch price was $349.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7402P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900XT offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7402P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402P versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900XT — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900XT (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 7402P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900XT uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402P scores 43,759 against the Ryzen 9 5900XT's 44,105 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900XT. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900XT.
| Feature | EPYC 7402P | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 4.8 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 43,759 | 44,105 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 22,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,320 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 14,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7402P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7402P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7402P) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900XT). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7402P) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900XT) — the EPYC 7402P offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7402P) and X570,B550,A520,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 5900XT).
| Feature | EPYC 7402P | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900XT has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 7402P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7402P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900XT). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900XT targets High End Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7402P rivals Xeon Gold 6248.
| Feature | EPYC 7402P | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | High End Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7402P was priced at $1280, while the Ryzen 9 5900XT came in at $349. On launch pricing ($1280 vs $349), Ryzen 9 5900XT was $931 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7402P delivers 34.2 pts/$ vs 126.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900XT — making the Ryzen 9 5900XT the 114.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7402P | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1280 | $349-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.2 | 126.4+270% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7402P and Ryzen 9 5900XT
