EPYC 7402P vs Xeon Silver 4416+

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7402P

24 Cores48 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Silver 4416+

20 Cores40 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7402P vs Xeon Silver 4416+ Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7402P

24 / 48

43,759

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Silver 4416+

20 / 40

44,140

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7402P vs Xeon Silver 4416+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7402P vs Xeon Silver 4416+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7402P

2019

Why buy it

✅+241.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 38 MB).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4416+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (43,759 vs 44,140).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.2 vs 37.2 PassMark/$ ($1,280 MSRP vs $1,186 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4416+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Silver 4416+

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $94 less on MSRP ($1,186 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 34.2 PassMark/$ ($1,186 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).
✅Draws 165W instead of 180W, a 15W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 128 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4416+ better than EPYC 7402P?

Yes. Xeon Silver 4416+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Silver 4416+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4416+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4416+ is the better buy right now. Xeon Silver 4416+ comes in $94 cheaper on MSRP at $1,186 MSRP versus $1,280 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 8.9% better value on MSRP (37.2 vs 34.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4416+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 40 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7402P vs Xeon Silver 4416+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7402P

The EPYC 7402P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,759 points. Launch price was $1,250.

Xeon Silver 4416+

The Xeon Silver 4416+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 44,140 points. Launch price was $1,186.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7402P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4416+ offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the EPYC 7402P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402P versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4416+ — a 15.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4416+ (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7402P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4416+ uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402P scores 43,759 against the Xeon Silver 4416+'s 44,140 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Silver 4416+. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402P vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon Silver 4416+.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Xeon Silver 4416+
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+20%	20 / 40
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	3.9 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+241%	37.5 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	43,759	44,140

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7402P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4416+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7402P versus 4800 on the Xeon Silver 4416+ — the Xeon Silver 4416+ supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7402P) vs 80 (Xeon Silver 4416+) — the EPYC 7402P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7402P) and C741 (Xeon Silver 4416+).

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Xeon Silver 4416+
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7402P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4416+). Direct competitor: EPYC 7402P rivals Xeon Gold 6248; Xeon Silver 4416+ rivals EPYC 9254.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Xeon Silver 4416+
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7402P was priced at $1280, while the Xeon Silver 4416+ came in at $1186. On launch pricing ($1280 vs $1186), Xeon Silver 4416+ was $94 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7402P delivers 34.2 pts/$ vs 37.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4416+ — making the Xeon Silver 4416+ the 8.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP	$1280	$1186-7%
Performance per Dollar	34.2	37.2+9%
Release Date	2019	2023

Search EPYC 7402P on Amazon

Search Xeon Silver 4416+ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.