EPYC 7473X vs Xeon w7-3545

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7473X

24 Cores48 Thrd240 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-3545

24 Cores48 Thrd310 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7473X vs Xeon w7-3545 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7473X

24 / 48

59,280

+1.4%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

Ryzen 9 5900X

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w7-3545

24 / 48

58,453

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7473X vs Xeon w7-3545 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7473X vs Xeon w7-3545: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7473X

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅+1037.8% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 68 MB).
✅Draws 240W instead of 310W, a 70W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3545 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 28.7 PassMark/$ ($3,900 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3545 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w7-3545

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,861 less on MSRP ($2,039 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 88.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.7 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (58,453 vs 59,280).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (68 MB vs 768 MB).
❌29.2% higher power demand at 310W vs 240W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3545 better than EPYC 7473X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w7-3545 is ahead with a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7473X pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark. EPYC 7473X also has the bigger cache pool with 1037.8% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 68 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7473X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1037.8% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 68 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-3545 is the better buy right now. Xeon w7-3545 comes in $1,861 cheaper on MSRP at $2,039 MSRP versus $3,900 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7473X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.4% better PassMark. It is also 88.6% better value on MSRP (28.7 vs 15.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3545 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7473X vs Xeon w7-3545 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7473X

The EPYC 7473X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,280 points. Launch price was $3,900.

Xeon w7-3545

The Xeon w7-3545 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 310 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 58,453 points. Launch price was $2,039.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7473X and Xeon w7-3545 share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7473X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3545 — a 25.9% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3545 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7473X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon w7-3545 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7473X scores 59,280 against the Xeon w7-3545's 58,453 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 7473X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7473X vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3545.

Feature	EPYC 7473X	Xeon w7-3545
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.8 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+4%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+1038%	67.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Milan-X (2022)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	59,280+1%	58,453
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,200

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7473X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3545 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7473X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3545 — the Xeon w7-3545 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7473X) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3545) — the EPYC 7473X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7473X) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3545).

Feature	EPYC 7473X	Xeon w7-3545
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3545 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w7-3545 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7473X) vs true (Xeon w7-3545). Direct competitor: EPYC 7473X rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon w7-3545 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 7473X	Xeon w7-3545
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7473X was priced at $3900, while the Xeon w7-3545 came in at $2039. On launch pricing ($3900 vs $2039), Xeon w7-3545 was $1861 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7473X delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 28.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3545 — making the Xeon w7-3545 the 61.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7473X	Xeon w7-3545
MSRP	$3900	$2039-48%
Performance per Dollar	15.2	28.7+89%
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 7473X on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3545 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.