EPYC 7502P vs Xeon Gold 6348

AMD

EPYC 7502P

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6348

28 Cores56 Thrd235 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 7502P vs Xeon Gold 6348 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7502P vs Xeon Gold 6348 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7502P vs Xeon Gold 6348: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7502P

2019

Why buy it

  • +204.8% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 42 MB).
  • Costs $1,283 less on MSRP ($2,300 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
  • Delivers 53.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.3 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($2,300 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
  • Draws 180W instead of 235W, a 55W reduction.
  • 100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6348 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (51,206 vs 51,843).

Xeon Gold 6348

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (42 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 22.3 PassMark/$ ($3,583 MSRP vs $2,300 MSRP).
  • 30.6% higher power demand at 235W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6348 better than EPYC 7502P?
Yes. Xeon Gold 6348 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6348 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6348 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6348 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7502P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6348 comes in 55.8% more expensive on MSRP at $3,583 MSRP versus $2,300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7502P is also 53.9% better value on MSRP (22.3 vs 14.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6348 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 28 cores / 56 threads instead of 32/64. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7502P vs Xeon Gold 6348 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7502P

The EPYC 7502P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 51,206 points. Launch price was $2,300.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6348

The Xeon Gold 6348 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 42 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 235 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 51,843 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7502P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6348 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 7502P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7502P versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6348 — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6348 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7502P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6348 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7502P scores 51,206 against the Xeon Gold 6348's 51,843 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6348. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7502P vs 42 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6348.

FeatureEPYC 7502PXeon Gold 6348
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+14%
28 / 56
Boost Clock
3.35 GHz
3.5 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+205%
42 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+51100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 14 nm-30%
10 nm
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark
51,206
51,843+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7502P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6348 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7502P) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6348) — the EPYC 7502P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7502P) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6348).

FeatureEPYC 7502PXeon Gold 6348
Socket
TR4
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+100%
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7502P rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Xeon Gold 6348 rivals EPYC 7543.

FeatureEPYC 7502PXeon Gold 6348
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7502P was priced at $2300, while the Xeon Gold 6348 came in at $3583. On launch pricing ($2300 vs $3583), EPYC 7502P was $1283 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7502P delivers 22.3 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6348 — making the EPYC 7502P the 42.4% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7502PXeon Gold 6348
MSRP
$2300-36%
$3583
Performance per Dollar
22.3+54%
14.5
Release Date
2019
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.