EPYC 7502P
VS
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

EPYC 7502P vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

AMD

EPYC 7502P

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

16 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7502P

#339
Xeon w7-3555
MSRP: $2749|Avg: $2199
111%
#340
Xeon w7-3445
MSRP: $1989|Avg: $2596
111%
#341
EPYC 9275F
MSRP: $3439|Avg: $3439
111%
#342
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
MSRP: $3899|Avg: $3971.7
110%
#343
EPYC 7543P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $115
110%
#344
EPYC 9455P
MSRP: $4819|Avg: $4366
109%
#345
EPYC 9274F
MSRP: $3060|Avg: $2490
109%
#346
Xeon Gold 6438Y+
MSRP: $2607|Avg: $389
108%
#348
Xeon Gold 6426Y
MSRP: $2145|Avg: N/A
106%
#349
EPYC 4565P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $1980
105%
#351
Xeon W-2295
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $1400
104%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
102%
#353
EPYC 7452
MSRP: $2025|Avg: $2025
102%
#354
EPYC 7502P
MSRP: $2300|Avg: $1299
100%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
99%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
99%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
98%
#358
Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP: $2889|Avg: $468
97%
#359
EPYC 9354
MSRP: $3420|Avg: $2498
97%
#359
Xeon Gold 6530
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1846
97%
#361
Xeon Silver 4114
MSRP: $612|Avg: $30
96%
#362
EPYC 7532
MSRP: $2380|Avg: $225
96%
#363
Xeon W-2191B
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $39
96%
#364
Xeon Gold 5320
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1834
95%
#365
EPYC 7513
MSRP: $2840|Avg: $389
95%
#366
Xeon Silver 4216
MSRP: $1011|Avg: $800
93%
#367
EPYC 9454P
MSRP: $4598|Avg: $3333
92%
#369
Xeon Gold 6542Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 7502PRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,299)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7502P (2019) relies on 7 nm, 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 7502PRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,299)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7502P and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

AMD

EPYC 7502P

The EPYC 7502P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 51,206 points. Launch price was $2,300.

AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,646 points. Launch price was $500.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7502P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7502P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7502P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — a 41.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7502P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7502P scores 51,206 against the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395's 51,646 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7502P vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395.

FeatureEPYC 7502PRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+100%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3.35 GHz
5.1 GHz+52%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+100%
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark
51,206
51,646
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7502P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7502P versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7502P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7502P) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7502P) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) — the EPYC 7502P offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7502P) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395).

FeatureEPYC 7502PRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Socket
TR4
FP11
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
8000+150%
Max RAM Capacity
4096+3100%
128
RAM Channels
8+100%
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+700%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7502P) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the EPYC 7502P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7502P rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 rivals Core Ultra 7 255HX.

FeatureEPYC 7502PRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
AMD Radeon 8060S
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7502P launched at $2300 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 debuted at $0. At current prices ($1299 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is $1299 cheaper.

FeatureEPYC 7502PRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
MSRP
$2300
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$1299
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
39.4
Release Date
2019
2025