EPYC 7542 vs Xeon Platinum 8352M

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7542

32 Cores64 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8352M

32 Cores64 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7542 vs Xeon Platinum 8352M Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7542

32 / 64

45,359

+2.1%

Ryzen 5 8600G

Ryzen 9 8945H

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Platinum 8352M

32 / 64

44,406

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7542 vs Xeon Platinum 8352M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7542 vs Xeon Platinum 8352M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7542

2019

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 128 MB vs 48 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Costs $1,071 less on MSRP ($3,400 MSRP vs $4,471 MSRP).
✅Delivers 34.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.3 vs 9.9 PassMark/$ ($3,400 MSRP vs $4,471 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌21.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 185W.

Xeon Platinum 8352M

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 185W instead of 225W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (48 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (44,406 vs 45,359).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 13.3 PassMark/$ ($4,471 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7542 better than Xeon Platinum 8352M?

Yes. EPYC 7542 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7542 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 48 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7542 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7542 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7542 comes in $1,071 cheaper on MSRP at $3,400 MSRP versus $4,471 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 34.3% better value on MSRP (13.3 vs 9.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8352M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7542 vs Xeon Platinum 8352M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7542

The EPYC 7542 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 45,359 points. Launch price was $3,400.

Xeon Platinum 8352M

The Xeon Platinum 8352M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 44,406 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7542 and Xeon Platinum 8352M share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7542 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352M — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8352M (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 7542 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8352M uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7542 scores 45,359 against the Xeon Platinum 8352M's 44,406 — a 2.1% lead for the EPYC 7542. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7542 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8352M.

Feature	EPYC 7542	Xeon Platinum 8352M
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+26%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+167%	48 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	45,359+2%	44,406

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7542 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352M uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7542) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352M) — the EPYC 7542 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7542) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352M).

Feature	EPYC 7542	Xeon Platinum 8352M
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7542) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352M). Direct competitor: EPYC 7542 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R; Xeon Platinum 8352M rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7542	Xeon Platinum 8352M
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7542 was priced at $3400, while the Xeon Platinum 8352M came in at $4471. On launch pricing ($3400 vs $4471), EPYC 7542 was $1071 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7542 delivers 13.3 pts/$ vs 9.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352M — making the EPYC 7542 the 29.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7542	Xeon Platinum 8352M
MSRP	$3400-24%	$4471
Performance per Dollar	13.3+34%	9.9
Release Date	2019	2021

Search EPYC 7542 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8352M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.