EPYC 7642
VS
Core Ultra 7 265K

EPYC 7642 vs Core Ultra 7 265K

AMD

EPYC 7642

48 Cores96 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 265K

20 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.5 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7642

#442
EPYC 7542
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $899
107%
#443
EPYC 9655
MSRP: $11852|Avg: $11852
106%
#444
Xeon 6781P
MSRP: $8960|Avg: $8960
106%
#445
Xeon Gold 6338N
MSRP: $3200|Avg: $3200
106%
#446
Xeon Gold 5117
MSRP: $1286|Avg: $300
106%
#447
EPYC 73F3
MSRP: $3521|Avg: $2100
105%
#448
EPYC 9384X
MSRP: $5529|Avg: $4157
105%
#449
EPYC 8534P
MSRP: $5529|Avg: $5529
105%
#450
EPYC 9565
MSRP: $10486|Avg: $8233
104%
#450
EPYC 7663
MSRP: $6366|Avg: $6366
104%
#452
EPYC 9755
MSRP: $12984|Avg: $10931
103%
#454
Xeon Platinum 8368
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $429
103%
#456
EPYC 9575F
MSRP: $11791|Avg: $9238
101%
#457
EPYC 7642
MSRP: $4775|Avg: $850
100%
#458
EPYC 7573X
MSRP: $5590|Avg: $3580
100%
#459
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
99%
#460
Xeon Gold 6242R
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $779
97%
#460
Xeon E5-2686 V3
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $160
97%
#462
Xeon W-2175
MSRP: $1947|Avg: $180
97%
#463
EPYC 75F3
MSRP: $5383|Avg: $2799
96%
#464
Xeon W-3375
MSRP: $4951|Avg: $6000
96%
#466
Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP: $4607|Avg: $3145
95%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
95%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
95%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
92%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
92%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
92%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265K

#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
1428%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
1037%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
312%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
247%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
216%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
124%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
122%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
111%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
111%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
110%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
107%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
106%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
105%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
104%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
102%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
100%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
99%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
98%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
97%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
94%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
92%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
91%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
91%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
89%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
89%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
88%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
88%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
86%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
86%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
85%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($850) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7642 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7642Core Ultra 7 265K
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($850)
More affordable ($285)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 7 265K ($285), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($565 less, 66% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7642Core Ultra 7 265K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+196%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($850)
More affordable ($285)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 7 265K

AMD

EPYC 7642

The EPYC 7642 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 59,333 points. Launch price was $4,775.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265K

The Core Ultra 7 265K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,789 points. Launch price was $394.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7642 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265K offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the EPYC 7642 has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7642 versus 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265K — a 47.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265K (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The EPYC 7642 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265K uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7642 scores 59,333 against the Core Ultra 7 265K's 58,789 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7642. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7642 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265K.

FeatureEPYC 7642Core Ultra 7 265K
Cores / Threads
48 / 96+140%
20 / 20
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
5.5 GHz+62%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.9 GHz+63%
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+753%
30 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
3 MB (per core)+500%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark
59,333
58,789
Cinebench R23 Multi
36,309
Geekbench 6 Single
3,283
Geekbench 6 Multi
22,293
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7642 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265K uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7642 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265K — the EPYC 7642 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7642 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7642) vs 2 (Core Ultra 7 265K). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7642) vs 20 (Core Ultra 7 265K) — the EPYC 7642 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7642) and LGA1851 (Core Ultra 7 265K).

FeatureEPYC 7642Core Ultra 7 265K
Socket
TR4
LGA1851
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
3200+63900%
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
4096
256 GB+6553500%
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+540%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 7 265K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core Ultra 7 265K supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 7 265K includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 64EU), while the EPYC 7642 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7642 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

FeatureEPYC 7642Core Ultra 7 265K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Arc Graphics 64EU
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7642 launched at $4775 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265K debuted at $309. At current prices ($850 vs $285), the Core Ultra 7 265K is $565 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7642 delivers 69.8 pts/$ vs 206.3 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265K — making the Core Ultra 7 265K the 98.9% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7642Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP
$4775
$309-94%
Avg Price (30d)
$850
$285-66%
Performance per Dollar
69.8
206.3+196%
Release Date
2019
2024