Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 7642 vs Xeon Gold 5512U

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 7642

48 Cores96 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2019
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 5512U

28 Cores56 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7642 vs Xeon Gold 5512U Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7642
48 / 96
59,333
0.0%
brand logoRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
brand logoRyzen 9 5900X
brand logoRyzen 9 5950X
brand logoRyzen 9 9850HX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Xeon Gold 5512U
28 / 56
60,367
+1.7%
brand logoXeon W-2150B
brand logoCore i9-12900H
brand logoCore i9-12900
brand logoXeon W-3275M
brand logoCore i9-14900F
brand logoXeon w7-2475X
brand logoXeon w9-3575X
brand logoXeon w9-3495X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7642 vs Xeon Gold 5512U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 7642
low192 FPS
medium172 FPS
high138 FPS
ultra110 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 5512U
low184 FPS
medium162 FPS
high128 FPS
ultra104 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 7642
low427 FPS
medium381 FPS
high312 FPS
ultra249 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 5512U
low270 FPS
medium241 FPS
high200 FPS
ultra166 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 7642
low629 FPS
medium536 FPS
high486 FPS
ultra415 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 5512U
low777 FPS
medium691 FPS
high657 FPS
ultra581 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 7642
low909 FPS
medium829 FPS
high715 FPS
ultra619 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 5512U
low940 FPS
medium841 FPS
high726 FPS
ultra622 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 7642
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 5512U
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 7642
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 5512U
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra285 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 7642
low292 FPS
medium221 FPS
high203 FPS
ultra183 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 5512U
low310 FPS
medium232 FPS
high210 FPS
ultra188 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 7642
low297 FPS
medium262 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra162 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 5512U
low254 FPS
medium229 FPS
high180 FPS
ultra145 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 7642
low307 FPS
medium275 FPS
high255 FPS
ultra208 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 5512U
low312 FPS
medium277 FPS
high254 FPS
ultra209 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 7642
low230 FPS
medium203 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra159 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 5512U
low218 FPS
medium198 FPS
high169 FPS
ultra154 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 7642 vs Xeon Gold 5512U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7642

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (59,333 vs 60,367).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($4,775 MSRP vs $1,230 MSRP).
  • ❌21.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 185W.
  • ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5512U moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Gold 5512U

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
  • ✅Costs $3,545 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 295.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($1,230 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 185W instead of 225W, a 40W reduction.
  • ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7642 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5512U better than EPYC 7642?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7642 is ahead with a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5512U pulls ahead with 1.7% better PassMark. EPYC 7642 also has the bigger cache pool with 387.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 53 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5512U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 5512U is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 5512U comes in $3,545 cheaper on MSRP at $1,230 MSRP versus $4,775 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 7642 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 295.0% better value on MSRP (49.1 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5512U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of TR4, more multi-core headroom with 28 cores / 56 threads instead of 48/96, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7642 vs Xeon Gold 5512U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7642

The EPYC 7642 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 59,333 points. Launch price was $4,775.

Intel

Xeon Gold 5512U

The Xeon Gold 5512U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 60,367 points. Launch price was $1,230.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7642 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5512U offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 7642 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7642 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5512U — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5512U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 7642 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7642 scores 59,333 against the Xeon Gold 5512U's 60,367 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 5512U. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7642 vs 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5512U.

FeatureEPYC 7642Xeon Gold 5512U
Cores / Threads
48 / 96+71%
28 / 56
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+14%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+388%
52.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+25500%
2 MB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark
59,333
60,367+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7642 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7642 versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 5512U — the Xeon Gold 5512U supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7642) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5512U) — the EPYC 7642 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7642) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5512U).

FeatureEPYC 7642Xeon Gold 5512U
Socket
TR4
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4096
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+60%
80
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 5512U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7642 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Gold 5512U rivals EPYC 9354.

FeatureEPYC 7642Xeon Gold 5512U
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7642 was priced at $4775, while the Xeon Gold 5512U came in at $1230. On launch pricing ($4775 vs $1230), Xeon Gold 5512U was $3545 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7642 delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 49.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5512U — making the Xeon Gold 5512U the 119.2% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7642Xeon Gold 5512U
MSRP
$4775
$1230-74%
Performance per Dollar
12.4
49.1+296%
Release Date
2019
2023
Search EPYC 7642 on AmazonSearch Xeon Gold 5512U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.