EPYC 7642
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
EPYC 7642 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7642 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7642 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7642
2019Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 350W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (59,333 vs 60,054).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 31.6 PassMark/$ ($4,775 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,876 less on MSRP ($1,899 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 154.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.6 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌55.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX better than EPYC 7642?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7642 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7642
The EPYC 7642 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 59,333 points. Launch price was $4,775.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,054 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7642 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7642 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7642 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — a 43.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 7642 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7642 scores 59,333 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX's 60,054 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7642 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7642 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+200% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 5.3 GHz+56% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+88% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+300% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 59,333 | 60,054+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 36,742 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,020 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 21,079 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7642 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7642 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7642 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7642) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7642 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR5-5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+300% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7642) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7642 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX rivals Xeon w7-2495X.
| Feature | EPYC 7642 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7642 was priced at $4775, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX came in at $1899. On launch pricing ($4775 vs $1899), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX was $2876 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7642 delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 31.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX the 87.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7642 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4775 | $1899-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | 31.6+155% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7642 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
