EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 7642
EPYC 4584PX vs EPYC 7642 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4584PX vs EPYC 7642 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4584PX vs EPYC 7642: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,258 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 219.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 225W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
EPYC 7642
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (59,333 vs 60,169).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($4,775 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4584PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4584PX better than EPYC 7642?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4584PX vs EPYC 7642 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.
EPYC 7642
The EPYC 7642 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 59,333 points. Launch price was $4,775.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7642 offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 7642 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7642 — a 50.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7642 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the EPYC 7642's 59,333 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 4584PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7642.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | EPYC 7642 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 48 / 96+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+68% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+75% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 60,169+1% | 59,333 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7642 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus 3200 on the EPYC 7642 — the EPYC 4584PX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7642 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 8 (EPYC 7642). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 128 (EPYC 7642) — the EPYC 7642 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and SP3 (EPYC 7642).
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | EPYC 7642 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+63% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 4096+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4584PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4584PX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7642). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7642 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; EPYC 7642 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | EPYC 7642 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4584PX was priced at $1517, while the EPYC 7642 came in at $4775. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $4775), EPYC 4584PX was $3258 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 12.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7642 — making the EPYC 4584PX the 104.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | EPYC 7642 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-68% | $4775 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7+220% | 12.4 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4584PX and EPYC 7642
