EPYC 4584PX
Xeon Platinum 8380
EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon Platinum 8380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon Platinum 8380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $493 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 270W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 62,318).
Xeon Platinum 8380
2021Why buy it
- ✅+3.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 270W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 4584PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Xeon Platinum 8380?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.
Xeon Platinum 8380
The Xeon Platinum 8380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 40 cores and 80 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,318 points. Launch price was $5,846.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 cores / 80 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8380 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8380 — a 50.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the Xeon Platinum 8380's 62,318 — a 3.5% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8380. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 40 / 80+150% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+68% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+83% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+113% | 60 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 60,169 | 62,318+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 40,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8380 — the EPYC 4584PX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8380 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8380). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8380) — the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8380).
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+63% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 6144 GB+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4584PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8380). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8380 targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon Platinum 8380 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Datacenter |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4584PX was priced at $1517, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 came in at $2010. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $2010), EPYC 4584PX was $493 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 31.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8380 — making the EPYC 4584PX the 24.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-25% | $2010 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7+28% | 31.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4584PX and Xeon Platinum 8380
