EPYC 4584PX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
EPYC 4584PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4584PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4584PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 280W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 62,261).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+3.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($1,337 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.6 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 4584PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4584PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — a 30.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX's 62,261 — a 3.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+36% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+20% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 60,169 | 62,261+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 42,986 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,260 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 25,211 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — the EPYC 4584PX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX).
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+63% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 2048 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the EPYC 4584PX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4584PX was priced at $1517, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX came in at $1337. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $1337), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX was $180 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 46.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX the 16% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517 | $1337-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7 | 46.6+17% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4584PX and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
