EPYC 4584PX
Xeon 6710E
EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon 6710E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon 6710E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon 6710E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +41.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Costs $48 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6710E needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 61,404).
Xeon 6710E
2024Why buy it
- ✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅214.3% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌3.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,565 MSRPvs$1,517 MSRP
- ❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Xeon 6710E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon 6710E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.
Xeon 6710E
The Xeon 6710E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 61,404 points. Launch price was $2,749.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6710E offers 64 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6710E has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6710E — a 56.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6710E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the Xeon 6710E's 61,404 — a 2% lead for the Xeon 6710E. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6710E.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 64 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+78% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+75% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+33% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+300% |
| Process | 5 nm | Intel 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 60,169 | 61,404+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,225 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,400 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6710E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon 6710E — the Xeon 6710E supports 7.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6710E supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 8 (Xeon 6710E). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 88 (Xeon 6710E) — the Xeon 6710E offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and C741 (Xeon 6710E).
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200 | DDR5-5600+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 4096 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 88+214% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4584PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6710E). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon 6710E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6710E targets High Efficiency Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon 6710E rivals EPYC 9534.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Efficiency Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4584PX was priced at $1517, while the Xeon 6710E came in at $1565. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $1565), EPYC 4584PX was $48 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 39.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6710E — making the EPYC 4584PX the 1.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-3% | $1565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7+1% | 39.2 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4584PX and Xeon 6710E
