EPYC 7513 vs EPYC 7642

EPYC 7513 vs EPYC 7642 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7513

32 / 64

59,745

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 7642

48 / 96

59,333

0.0%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

Ryzen 9 5900X

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7513 vs EPYC 7642 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7513 vs EPYC 7642: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7513

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,935 less on MSRP ($2,840 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Delivers 69.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.0 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($2,840 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 225W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7642 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

EPYC 7642

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (59,333 vs 59,745).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($4,775 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7513 better than EPYC 7642?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7642 is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7513 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. EPYC 7642 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7513 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7513 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7513 comes in $1,935 cheaper on MSRP at $2,840 MSRP versus $4,775 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 7642 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 69.3% better value on MSRP (21.0 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7513 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 48/96. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7513 vs EPYC 7642 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7513

The EPYC 7513 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.65 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,745 points. Launch price was $2,840.

EPYC 7642

The EPYC 7642 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 59,333 points. Launch price was $4,775.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7513 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 7642 offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 7642 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.65 GHz on the EPYC 7513 versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7642 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 7513 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7513 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7642 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7513 scores 59,745 against the EPYC 7642's 59,333 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7513. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7513 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7642.

Feature	EPYC 7513	EPYC 7642
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	48 / 96+50%
Boost Clock	3.65 GHz+7%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+8%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	256 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	59,745	59,333

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7513 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7642 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7513) and SP3 (EPYC 7642).

Feature	EPYC 7513	EPYC 7642
Socket	SP3	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7513 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7642 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

Feature	EPYC 7513	EPYC 7642
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7513 was priced at $2840, while the EPYC 7642 came in at $4775. On launch pricing ($2840 vs $4775), EPYC 7513 was $1935 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7513 delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 12.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7642 — making the EPYC 7513 the 51.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7513	EPYC 7642
MSRP	$2840-41%	$4775
Performance per Dollar	21.0+69%	12.4
Release Date	2021	2019

Search EPYC 7513 on Amazon

Search EPYC 7642 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.