EPYC 7513 vs Xeon Gold 5512U

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7513

32 Cores64 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.65 GHz2021

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 5512U

28 Cores56 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7513 vs Xeon Gold 5512U Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7513

32 / 64

59,745

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Gold 5512U

28 / 56

60,367

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7513 vs Xeon Gold 5512U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7513 vs Xeon Gold 5512U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7513

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (59,745 vs 60,367).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($2,840 MSRP vs $1,230 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5512U moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Gold 5512U

2023

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,610 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).
✅Delivers 133.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($1,230 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).
✅Draws 185W instead of 200W, a 15W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7513 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5512U better than EPYC 7513?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7513 is ahead with a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5512U pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. EPYC 7513 also has the bigger cache pool with 143.8% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 53 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5512U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5512U is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 5512U comes in $1,610 cheaper on MSRP at $1,230 MSRP versus $2,840 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 7513 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 133.3% better value on MSRP (49.1 vs 21.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5512U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 28 cores / 56 threads instead of 32/64, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7513 vs Xeon Gold 5512U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7513

The EPYC 7513 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.65 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,745 points. Launch price was $2,840.

Xeon Gold 5512U

The Xeon Gold 5512U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 60,367 points. Launch price was $1,230.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7513 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5512U offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 7513 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.65 GHz on the EPYC 7513 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5512U — a 1.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5512U (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 7513 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7513 scores 59,745 against the Xeon Gold 5512U's 60,367 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Gold 5512U. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7513 vs 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5512U.

Feature	EPYC 7513	Xeon Gold 5512U
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+14%	28 / 56
Boost Clock	3.65 GHz	3.7 GHz+1%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+24%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+144%	52.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	59,745	60,367+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7513 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7513 versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 5512U — the Xeon Gold 5512U supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7513) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5512U) — the EPYC 7513 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7513) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5512U).

Feature	EPYC 7513	Xeon Gold 5512U
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 5512U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7513 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Gold 5512U rivals EPYC 9354.

Feature	EPYC 7513	Xeon Gold 5512U
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7513 was priced at $2840, while the Xeon Gold 5512U came in at $1230. On launch pricing ($2840 vs $1230), Xeon Gold 5512U was $1610 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7513 delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 49.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5512U — making the Xeon Gold 5512U the 80% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7513	Xeon Gold 5512U
MSRP	$2840	$1230-57%
Performance per Dollar	21.0	49.1+134%
Release Date	2021	2023

Search EPYC 7513 on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 5512U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.