
EPYC 74F3

EPYC 7513
EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7513 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7513 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7513: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 74F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,927 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 215.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.4 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌20% higher power demand at 240W vs 200W.
EPYC 7513
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 240W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (59,745 vs 60,666).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 66.4 PassMark/$ ($2,840 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 74F3 better than EPYC 7513?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7513 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 74F3
The EPYC 74F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,666 points. Launch price was $2,900.

EPYC 7513
The EPYC 7513 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.65 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,745 points. Launch price was $2,840.
Processing Power
The EPYC 74F3 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 7513 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7513 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 74F3 versus 3.65 GHz on the EPYC 7513 — a 9.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 74F3 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture using a 7 nm+ process. In PassMark, the EPYC 74F3 scores 60,666 against the EPYC 7513's 59,745 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC 74F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 74F3 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7513.
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+10% | 3.65 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+8% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 60,666+2% | 59,745 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 74F3) and SP3 (EPYC 7513).
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 74F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7513 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 74F3 was priced at $913, while the EPYC 7513 came in at $2840. On launch pricing ($913 vs $2840), EPYC 74F3 was $1927 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 74F3 delivers 66.4 pts/$ vs 21.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 7513 — making the EPYC 74F3 the 103.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $913-68% | $2840 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.4+216% | 21.0 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















