EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7513

AMD

EPYC 74F3

24 Cores48 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 7513

32 Cores64 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.65 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······

EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7513 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7513 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7513: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 74F3

2021

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Costs $1,927 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).
  • Delivers 215.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.4 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 20% higher power demand at 240W vs 200W.

EPYC 7513

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 200W instead of 240W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (59,745 vs 60,666).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 66.4 PassMark/$ ($2,840 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 74F3 better than EPYC 7513?
Yes. EPYC 74F3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 74F3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 74F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 74F3 is the better buy right now. EPYC 74F3 comes in $1,927 cheaper on MSRP at $913 MSRP versus $2,840 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 215.9% better value on MSRP (66.4 vs 21.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7513 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7513 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 74F3

The EPYC 74F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,666 points. Launch price was $2,900.

AMD

EPYC 7513

The EPYC 7513 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.65 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,745 points. Launch price was $2,840.

Processing Power

The EPYC 74F3 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 7513 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7513 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 74F3 versus 3.65 GHz on the EPYC 7513 — a 9.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 74F3 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture using a 7 nm+ process. In PassMark, the EPYC 74F3 scores 60,666 against the EPYC 7513's 59,745 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC 74F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 74F3 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7513.

FeatureEPYC 74F3EPYC 7513
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock
4 GHz+10%
3.65 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+8%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+100%
128 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm+
7 nm+
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
60,666+2%
59,745
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 74F3) and SP3 (EPYC 7513).

FeatureEPYC 74F3EPYC 7513
Socket
SP3
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 74F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7513 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

FeatureEPYC 74F3EPYC 7513
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 74F3 was priced at $913, while the EPYC 7513 came in at $2840. On launch pricing ($913 vs $2840), EPYC 74F3 was $1927 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 74F3 delivers 66.4 pts/$ vs 21.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 7513 — making the EPYC 74F3 the 103.8% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 74F3EPYC 7513
MSRP
$913-68%
$2840
Performance per Dollar
66.4+216%
21.0
Release Date
2021
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.