EPYC 7513
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
EPYC 7513 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7513 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7513 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7513
2021Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 350W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (59,745 vs 60,054).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 31.6 PassMark/$ ($2,840 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $941 less on MSRP ($1,899 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.6 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌75% higher power demand at 350W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX better than EPYC 7513?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7513 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7513
The EPYC 7513 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.65 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,745 points. Launch price was $2,840.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,054 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7513 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7513 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.65 GHz on the EPYC 7513 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — a 36.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 7513 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7513 scores 59,745 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX's 60,054 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7513 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7513 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.65 GHz | 5.3 GHz+45% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4.5 GHz+73% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 59,745 | 60,054 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 36,742 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,020 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 21,079 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7513 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7513 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7513 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7513) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7513 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR5-5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+300% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7513) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7513 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX rivals Xeon w7-2495X.
| Feature | EPYC 7513 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7513 was priced at $2840, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX came in at $1899. On launch pricing ($2840 vs $1899), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX was $941 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7513 delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 31.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX the 40.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7513 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2840 | $1899-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.0 | 31.6+50% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7513 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
