EPYC 9274F vs EPYC 7662
EPYC 9274F
EPYC 7662
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9274F
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7662
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9274F | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,490) | ✅ More affordable ($1,266) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9274F | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+92%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,490) | ✅ More affordable ($1,266) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9274F and EPYC 7662
EPYC 9274F
The EPYC 9274F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.05 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,982 points. Launch price was $3,060.
EPYC 7662
The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9274F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 7662 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7662 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9274F versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 — a 26.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9274F (base: 4.05 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9274F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the EPYC 7662 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9274F scores 73,982 against the EPYC 7662's 72,298 — a 2.3% lead for the EPYC 9274F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9274F vs 256 MB on the EPYC 7662.
| Feature | EPYC 9274F | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 64 / 128+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+30% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.05 GHz+102% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 32 MB+3100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 73,982+2% | 72,298 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9274F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7662 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9274F versus 3200 on the EPYC 7662 — the EPYC 9274F supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9274F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9274F) vs 8 (EPYC 7662). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9274F) and SP3 (EPYC 7662).
| Feature | EPYC 9274F | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9274F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9274F) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7662). Direct competitor: EPYC 9274F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.
| Feature | EPYC 9274F | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9274F launched at $3060 MSRP, while the EPYC 7662 debuted at $6150. At current prices ($2490 vs $1266), the EPYC 7662 is $1224 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9274F delivers 29.7 pts/$ vs 57.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 7662 — making the EPYC 7662 the 63.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9274F | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3060-50% | $6150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2490 | $1266-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.7 | 57.1+92% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9274F and EPYC 7662
