
EPYC 9334

Xeon 6520P
EPYC 9334 vs Xeon 6520P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9334 vs Xeon 6520P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9334 vs Xeon 6520P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9334
2022Why buy it
- ✅+2.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
Xeon 6520P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,695 less on MSRP ($1,295 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 125.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (64,010 vs 65,568).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6520P better than EPYC 9334?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9334 vs Xeon 6520P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9334
The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

Xeon 6520P
The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9334 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6520P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9334 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon 6520P (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9334 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6520P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9334 scores 65,568 against the Xeon 6520P's 64,010 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 9334. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334 vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+13% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 144 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | Intel 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 65,568+2% | 64,010 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 25,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9334 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6520P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9334 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6520P — the Xeon 6520P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 153500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9334) vs 8 (Xeon 6520P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9334) vs 88 (Xeon 6520P) — the EPYC 9334 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9334) and FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P).
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | DDR5-6400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 TB+153500% | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6520P targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9334 was priced at $2990, while the Xeon 6520P came in at $1295. On launch pricing ($2990 vs $1295), Xeon 6520P was $1695 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9334 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 49.4 pts/$ for the Xeon 6520P — making the Xeon 6520P the 77.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2990 | $1295-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9 | 49.4+126% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















