EPYC 9355P vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9355P

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9355P vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9355P

32 / 64

97,249

+333.6%

Ryzen 9 7945HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 / 16

22,430

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9355P vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9355P vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9355P

2024

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 256 MB vs 32 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,669 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
✅Delivers 110.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (32 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 97,249).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9355P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9355P moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9355P better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 9355P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9355P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9355P is the stronger fit. You are getting 333.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9355P is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9355P comes in 811.2% more expensive on MSRP at $2,998 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 110.2% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 32.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9355P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9355P vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9355P

The EPYC 9355P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 97,249 points. Launch price was $2,998.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9355P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9355P has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9355P versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.55 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9355P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9355P scores 97,249 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 125% lead for the EPYC 9355P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9355P vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+300%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.55 GHz	3.6 GHz+1%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+700%	32 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	97,249+334%	22,430

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9355P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9355P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 9355P supports 87.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9355P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9355P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9355P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 9355P offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9355P) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+88%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9355P) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: EPYC 9355P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9355P rivals Xeon 6740P.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	—
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9355P was priced at $2998, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($2998 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $2669 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9355P delivers 32.4 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 71% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$2998	$329-89%
Performance per Dollar	32.4	68.2+110%
Release Date	2024	2019

Search EPYC 9355P on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.