EPYC 9575F vs Ryzen 7 3700X
EPYC 9575F
Ryzen 7 3700X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9575F
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 3700X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,238) | ✅ More affordable ($140) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+902%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,238) | ✅ More affordable ($140) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9575F and Ryzen 7 3700X
EPYC 9575F
The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9575F packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9575F has 56 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 12.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 9575F (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9575F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 147.3% lead for the EPYC 9575F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+700% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+14% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+700% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 147,718+559% | 22,430 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,308 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9575F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9575F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 9575F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9575F) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9575F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 9575F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | — |
| Target Use | Data Center / High Frequency | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9575F launched at $11791 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. At current prices ($9238 vs $140), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $9098 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 16.0 pts/$ vs 160.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 163.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11791 | $329-97% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $9238 | $140-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.0 | 160.2+901% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9575F and Ryzen 7 3700X
