EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9654
EPYC 9475F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9654
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9475F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5,345) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,592) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+38%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5,345) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,592) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9654 and EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9654
The EPYC 9654 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 119,246 points. Launch price was $11,805.
EPYC 9475F
The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9654 packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the EPYC 9475F offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9654 has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654 versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F — a 25.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9475F (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.65 GHz). The EPYC 9654 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the EPYC 9475F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9654 scores 119,246 against the EPYC 9475F's 122,476 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 9475F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,250 vs 1,960, a 44.2% lead for the EPYC 9475F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,000 vs 45,000 (76.9% advantage for the EPYC 9475F). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9654 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F.
| Feature | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 192+100% | 48 / 96 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.65 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total)+50% | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 119,246 | 122,476+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250 | 1,960+57% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000 | 45,000+125% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9475F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9654) and SP5 (EPYC 9475F).
| Feature | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6144 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9654) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9475F). Primary use case: EPYC 9654 targets Data Center, EPYC 9475F targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9654 rivals Xeon 8592+; EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P.
| Feature | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center | Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9654 launched at $11805 MSRP, while the EPYC 9475F debuted at $7592. At current prices ($5345 vs $7592), the EPYC 9654 is $2247 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9654 delivers 22.3 pts/$ vs 16.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9475F — making the EPYC 9654 the 32.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11805 | $7592-36% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5345-30% | $7592 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.3+39% | 16.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9654 and EPYC 9475F
