EPYC 9684X vs Xeon 6781P

EPYC 9684X vs Xeon 6781P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9684X

96 / 192

122,017

+3.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Xeon 6781P

80 / 160

117,946

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9684X vs Xeon 6781P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9684X vs Xeon 6781P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9684X

2023

Why buy it

✅+3.5% higher PassMark.
✅+242.9% larger total L3 cache (1.1 GB vs 336 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($14,756 MSRP vs $8,960 MSRP).

Xeon 6781P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,796 less on MSRP ($8,960 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.2 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($8,960 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.
✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (117,946 vs 122,017).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (336 MB vs 1.1 GB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6781P better than EPYC 9684X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6781P is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9684X pulls ahead with 3.5% better PassMark. EPYC 9684X also has the bigger cache pool with 242.9% larger total L3 cache (1.1 GB vs 336 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9684X is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.5% better PassMark, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 242.9% larger total L3 cache (1.1 GB vs 336 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6781P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6781P comes in $5,796 cheaper on MSRP at $8,960 MSRP versus $14,756 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9684X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3.5% better PassMark. It is also 59.2% better value on MSRP (13.2 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6781P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9684X vs Xeon 6781P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9684X

The EPYC 9684X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1152 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,017 points. Launch price was $14,756.

Xeon 6781P

The Xeon 6781P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 80 cores and 160 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 336 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 117,946 points. Launch price was $8,960.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9684X packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the Xeon 6781P offers 80 cores / 160 threads — the EPYC 9684X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9684X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6781P — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6781P (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9684X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6781P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9684X scores 122,017 against the Xeon 6781P's 117,946 — a 3.4% lead for the EPYC 9684X. L3 cache: 1152 MB (total) on the EPYC 9684X vs 336 MB (total) on the Xeon 6781P.

Feature	EPYC 9684X	Xeon 6781P
Cores / Threads	96 / 192+20%	80 / 160
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.55 GHz+27%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	1152 MB (total)+243%	336 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Genoa-X (2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	122,017+3%	117,946

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9684X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6781P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9684X versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6781P — the Xeon 6781P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9684X supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9684X) vs 8 (Xeon 6781P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9684X) vs 136 (Xeon 6781P) — the Xeon 6781P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 9684X	Xeon 6781P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	136+6%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9684X) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6781P). Primary use case: EPYC 9684X targets HPC / Cache Sensitive Workloads, Xeon 6781P targets Data Center / Cloud Scale. Direct competitor: EPYC 9684X rivals Xeon 6979P; Xeon 6781P rivals EPYC 9655.

Feature	EPYC 9684X	Xeon 6781P
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	HPC / Cache Sensitive Workloads	Data Center / Cloud Scale

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9684X was priced at $14756, while the Xeon 6781P came in at $8960. On launch pricing ($14756 vs $8960), Xeon 6781P was $5796 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9684X delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6781P — making the Xeon 6781P the 45.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9684X	Xeon 6781P
MSRP	$14756	$8960-39%
Performance per Dollar	8.3	13.2+59%
Release Date	2023	2025

Search EPYC 9684X on Amazon

Search Xeon 6781P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.