EPYC 9734 vs Core i5-10400F
EPYC 9734
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9734
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9734 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,598) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Bergamo (2023) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9734 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+724%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,598) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9734 and Core i5-10400F
EPYC 9734
The EPYC 9734 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 112 cores and 224 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 102,286 points. Launch price was $9,600.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9734 packs 112 cores / 224 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9734 has 106 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 9734 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 9734 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9734 scores 102,286 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 154.8% lead for the EPYC 9734. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9734 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | EPYC 9734 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 112 / 224+1767% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.3 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+2033% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Bergamo (2023) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 102,286+685% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9734 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9734 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the EPYC 9734 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9734) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9734) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the EPYC 9734 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9734) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | EPYC 9734 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+700% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9734) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: EPYC 9734 targets Data Center / High Density, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9734 rivals Xeon 6780E; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | EPYC 9734 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Data Center / High Density | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9734 launched at $9600 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($6598 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $6496 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9734 delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 156.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9734 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9600 | $160-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $6598 | $102-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.5 | 127.7+724% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9734 and Core i5-10400F
