Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro 2460 vs GeForce GTX 1060

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro 2460

2012Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro 2460 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Performance Spectrum

FirePro 2460
0.5 GB 75
170
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6250
brand logoRadeon HD 7290
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON X1800
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 4570
brand logoRadeon R9 270X
brand logoRadeon RX 6500 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
GeForce GTX 1060
6 GB 180
10,064
+5820.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 680
brand logoGeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce GTX 980 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2460 vs GeForce GTX 1060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2460

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 170mm instead of 173mm, a 3mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (170 vs 10,064).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅+5820% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Delivers 4179.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
  • ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅FirePro 2460 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5820% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 170), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $69 more expensive on MSRP at $249 vs $180, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4179.5% (40.4 vs 0.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro 2460 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 2460

The FirePro 2460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2460 scores 170 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 5820%. The FirePro 2460 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2460) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2460) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
170
10,064+5820%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
512
2560+400%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+1055%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
32
160+400%
L1 Cache
128 KB
960 KB+650%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 2460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 2460 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2460 and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 2460) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
6 GB+1100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (FirePro 2460) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
11
12+9%
OpenGL
4.4
4.5+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 2460) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2460) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
UVD 2.3
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
UVD 2.3
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2460 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 82.4% difference. The FirePro 2460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2460) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce GTX 1060
TDP
75W-58%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin
Length
170mm
173mm
Height
69mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
65°C
—
Perf/Watt
2.3
55.9+2330%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2460 came in at $180, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. On MSRP, FirePro 2460 was 27.7% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 2460) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 4388.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$180-28%
$249
Performance per Dollar
0.9
40.4+4389%
Codename
Cape Verde
GP104
Release
June 13 2012
May 27 2016
Ranking
#732
#137
Search FirePro 2460 on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 1060 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.