FirePro 2460 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

FirePro 2460

2012Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······

FirePro 2460 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2460 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2460

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $219 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
  • Measures 170mm instead of 242mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (170 vs 20,312).
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • +11848.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 5290.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
  • 42.4% longer card at 242mm vs 170mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 11848.2% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 170), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 38 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $219 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $180, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5290.2% (50.9 vs 0.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro 2460 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 2460

The FirePro 2460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2460 scores 170 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 11848.2%. The FirePro 2460 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2460) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2460) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
170
20,312+11848%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
512
4864+850%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS
16.2 TFLOPS+2009%
ROPs
16
80+400%
TMUs
32
152+375%
L1 Cache
0.13 MB
4.8 MB+3592%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 2460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 2460 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2460 and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 2460) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
8 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (FirePro 2460) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
DirectX
11
12 Ultimate (12_2)+9%
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 2460) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2460) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Encoder
UVD 2.3
NVENC (Ampere)
Decoder
UVD 2.3
NVDEC (Ampere)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2460 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The FirePro 2460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2460) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75.

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP
75W-63%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
170mm
242mm
Height
69mm
112mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
65°C-13%
75
Perf/Watt
2.3
101.6+4317%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2460 came in at $180, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, FirePro 2460 was 54.9% cheaper ($219 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 2460) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 5555.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro 2460GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP
$180-55%
$399
Performance per Dollar
0.9
50.9+5556%
Codename
Cape Verde
GA104
Release
June 13 2012
December 1 2020
Ranking
#732
#73

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.