FirePro 2460
GeForce RTX 4070
FirePro 2460 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2460 vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro 2460 vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2460
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $419 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 170mm instead of 304mm, a 134mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (170 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+15734.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 4658.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
- ❌78.8% longer card at 304mm vs 170mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2460 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro 2460
The FirePro 2460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2460 scores 170 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 15734.7%. The FirePro 2460 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2460) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2460) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 170 | 26,919+15735% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 5888+1050% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+3696% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 184+475% |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 5.8 MB+4362% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 36 MB+14300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro 2460 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 2460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2460 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2460 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 2460) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 12 GB+2300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 36 MB+14300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (FirePro 2460) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 | 12.2+11% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 2460) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2460) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2460 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The FirePro 2460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2460) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-63% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 170mm | 304mm |
| Height | 69mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 1-67% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.3 | 134.6+5752% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 2460 came in at $180, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, FirePro 2460 was 69.9% cheaper ($419 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 2460) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 4888.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $180-70% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 44.9+4889% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | AD104 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #732 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 2460 and GeForce RTX 4070
