FirePro 3D V5800 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

FirePro 3D V5800

2010Core: 690 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······

FirePro 3D V5800 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V5800 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V5800

2010

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,232 vs 10,749).
  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 183.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $479 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • +772.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $310 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
  • Delivers 2372.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 772.5% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 1,232), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $310 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $479, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2372.9% (63.6 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro 3D V5800 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V5800

The FirePro 3D V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $479.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro 3D V5800 scores 1,232 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 772.5%. The FirePro 3D V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureFirePro 3D V5800GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score
1,232
10,749+772%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Ampere
Process Node
40 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
800
2304+188%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.104 TFLOPS
6.774 TFLOPS+514%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
72+80%
L1 Cache
0.08 MB
2.3 MB+2775%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 3D V5800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro 3D V5800GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V5800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V5800 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V5800GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
6 GB+500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
96-bit+50%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro 3D V5800GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX
11.0
12 Ultimate+9%
OpenGL
4.1
4.6+12%
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureFirePro 3D V5800GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder
UVD 2.3
NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder
UVD 2.3
NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V5800 draws 74W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 5.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V5800GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP
74W
70W-5%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
229mm
160mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
75°C-17%
Perf/Watt
16.6
153.6+825%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V5800 came in at $479, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 64.7% cheaper ($310 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 2346.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro 3D V5800GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP
$479
$169-65%
Performance per Dollar
2.6
63.6+2346%
Codename
Juniper
GA107
Release
April 26 2010
February 2 2024
Ranking
#780
#252

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.