
FirePro S10000 vs Quadro P1000

FirePro S10000
Popular choices:

Quadro P1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro S10000 is positioned at rank #336 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S10000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S10000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P1000.
| Insight | FirePro S10000 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (305mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P1000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P1000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $500), it costs 84% less, resulting in a 519.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro S10000 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+519.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S10000 and Quadro P1000

FirePro S10000
The FirePro S10000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,537 points. Launch price was $3,599.

Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S10000 scores 4,537 and the Quadro P1000 reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S10000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (FirePro S10000) vs 640 (Quadro P1000). Raw compute: 3.405 TFLOPS ×2 (FirePro S10000) vs 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1519 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,537 | 4,495 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+540% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.405 TFLOPS ×2+119% | 1.555 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1519 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 32 ×2+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112 ×2+250% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+133% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S10000) vs 1 MB (Quadro P1000) — the Quadro P1000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S10000) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S10000) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S10000) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000).
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S10000 draws 375W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 161.4% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S10000) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 305mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 40W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 305mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 12.1 | 112.4+829% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S10000 launched at $3599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Quadro P1000 launched at $0 and now averages $80. The Quadro P1000 costs 84% less ($420 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.1 (FirePro S10000) vs 56.2 (Quadro P1000) — the Quadro P1000 offers 517.6% better value. The Quadro P1000 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3599 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $80-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | 56.2+518% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GP107 |
| Release | November 12 2012 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #461 | #466 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












