FirePro S10000 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
FirePro S10000
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro S10000 is positioned at rank #336 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S10000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S10000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S10000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
| Insight | FirePro S10000 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (305mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro S10000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
FirePro S10000
The FirePro S10000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,537 points. Launch price was $3,599.
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S10000 scores 4,537 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL reaches 4,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S10000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (FirePro S10000) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 3.405 TFLOPS ×2 (FirePro S10000) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1011 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,537 | 4,498 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+220% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.405 TFLOPS ×2+32% | 2.588 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1011 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 ×2+40% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+40% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S10000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 0 MB. The FirePro S10000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S10000) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S10000 draws 375W versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 65W — a 140.9% difference. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S10000) vs 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 65W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 305mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.1 | 69.2+472% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S10000 launched at $3599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL costs 100+% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.1 (FirePro S10000) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3599 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tahiti | Polaris 22 |
| Release | November 12 2012 | April 24 2018 |
| Ranking | #461 | #464 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
