
FirePro S10000

Tesla K40c
FirePro S10000 vs Tesla K40c Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro S10000 vs Tesla K40c FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro S10000 vs Tesla K40c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro S10000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,100 less on MSRP ($3,599 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($3,599 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌53.1% higher power demand at 375W vs 245W.
- ❌14.2% longer card at 305mm vs 267mm.
Tesla K40c
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 245W instead of 375W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 305mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌113.9% HIGHER MSRP$7,699 MSRPvs$3,599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S10000 vs Tesla K40c Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S10000
The FirePro S10000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,537 points. Launch price was $3,599.

Tesla K40c
The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S10000 scores 4,537 and the Tesla K40c reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S10000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (FirePro S10000) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Raw compute: 3.405 TFLOPS ×2 (FirePro S10000) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,537 | 4,495 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+42% | 2880 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.405 TFLOPS ×2 | 5.046 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz+8% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 112 ×2 | 240+114% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+87% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.5 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S10000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K40c carries 2 GB. FirePro S10000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S10000 and 64-bit on the Tesla K40c. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S10000) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the Tesla K40c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.5 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S10000) vs 11_0 (Tesla K40c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S10000 draws 375W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 41.9% difference. The Tesla K40c is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S10000) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 305mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 245W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 305mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.1 | 18.3+51% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro S10000 came in at $3599, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699. On MSRP, FirePro S10000 was 53.3% cheaper ($4100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (FirePro S10000) vs 0.6 (Tesla K40c) — the FirePro S10000 offers 116.7% better value. The newer card here is Tesla K40c (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3599-53% | $7699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3+117% | 0.6 |
| Codename | Tahiti | GK180 |
| Release | November 12 2012 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #461 | #465 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















