FirePro S9050 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

FirePro S9050

2014Core: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······

FirePro S9050 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S9050 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S9050

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,901 vs 10,749).
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1082.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • +119.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $1,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 2494.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 119.3% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 4,901), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,830 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2494.2% (63.6 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro S9050 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 119.3%. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score
4,901
10,749+119%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
1792
2304+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS
6.774 TFLOPS+110%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112+56%
72
L1 Cache
0.44 MB
2.3 MB+423%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro S9050 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S9050 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S9050 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
96-bit+50%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX
12
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder
UVD 3.2
NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 254mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP
225W
70W-69%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
254mm
160mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
75°C-17%
Perf/Watt
21.8
153.6+605%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S9050 came in at $1999, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 91.5% cheaper ($1830 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 2444% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro S9050GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP
$1999
$169-92%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
63.6+2444%
Codename
Tahiti
GA107
Release
August 7 2014
February 2 2024
Ranking
#446
#252

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.