
FirePro S9050

RTXA5000-24Q
FirePro S9050 vs RTXA5000-24Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro S9050 vs RTXA5000-24Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro S9050 vs RTXA5000-24Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro S9050
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,722 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 89.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RTXA5000-24Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌86.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,721 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S9050 vs RTXA5000-24Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S9050
The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

RTXA5000-24Q
The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the RTXA5000-24Q reaches 4,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,901+2% | 4,803 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 8192+357% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+761% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 112 | 256+129% |
| L1 Cache | 0.44 MB | 8 MB+1718% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 6 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTXA5000-24Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro S9050 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9050 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-24Q carries 2 GB. FirePro S9050 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S9050 and 64-bit on the RTXA5000-24Q. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 6 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 2.2% difference. The FirePro S9050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-2% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 254mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 21.8+4% | 20.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro S9050 came in at $1999, while the RTXA5000-24Q launched at $3721. On MSRP, FirePro S9050 was 46.3% cheaper ($1722 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 1.3 (RTXA5000-24Q) — the FirePro S9050 offers 92.3% better value. The newer card here is RTXA5000-24Q (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999-46% | $3721 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5+92% | 1.3 |
| Codename | Tahiti | GA102 |
| Release | August 7 2014 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #446 | #53 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














