FirePro V7000 vs Radeon R9 260

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V7000 vs Radeon R9 260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V7000 vs Radeon R9 260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V7000

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 275W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
546.8% HIGHER MSRP
$899 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Radeon R9 260

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $760 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 523.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌83.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro V7000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (3,162 vs 3,048), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro V7000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 260 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $760 cheaper on MSRP at $139 vs $899, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 523.4% (21.9 vs 3.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 260 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V7000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V7000 vs Radeon R9 260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V7000

The FirePro V7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points. Launch price was $1,249.

Radeon R9 260

The Radeon R9 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,048 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V7000 scores 3,162 and the Radeon R9 260 reaches 3,048 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 260 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7000) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 260). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro V7000) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 260).

Feature	FirePro V7000	Radeon R9 260
G3D Mark Score	3,162+4%	3,048
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	2560+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.432 TFLOPS	4.849 TFLOPS+99%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	160+100%
L1 Cache	320 KB	640 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V7000	Radeon R9 260
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 260 carries 2 GB. FirePro V7000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 260. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V7000) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 260) — the Radeon R9 260 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro V7000	Radeon R9 260
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V7000 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 260's 275W — a 58.8% difference. The FirePro V7000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7000) vs 450W (Radeon R9 260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	FirePro V7000	Radeon R9 260
TDP	150W-45%	275W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	242mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	21.1+90%	11.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V7000 came in at $899, while the Radeon R9 260 launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R9 260 was 84.5% cheaper ($760 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.5 (FirePro V7000) vs 21.9 (Radeon R9 260) — the Radeon R9 260 offers 525.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 260 (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro V7000	Radeon R9 260
MSRP	$899	$139-85%
Performance per Dollar	3.5	21.9+526%
Codename	Pitcairn	Hawaii
Release	August 27 2012	November 5 2013
Ranking	#462	#316

Search FirePro V7000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 260 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.