FirePro W5130M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

FirePro W5130M

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

FirePro W5130M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W5130M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W5130M

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,408 vs 10,749).
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • +663.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 663.4% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 1,408), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro W5130M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W5130M

The FirePro W5130M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,408 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro W5130M scores 1,408 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 663.4%. The FirePro W5130M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W5130M) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (FirePro W5130M) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1470 MHz.

FeatureFirePro W5130MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score
1,408
10,749+663%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
512
2304+350%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9472 TFLOPS
6.774 TFLOPS+615%
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1470 MHz+59%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
72+125%
L1 Cache
0.13 MB
2.3 MB+1669%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W5130M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro W5130MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W5130M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W5130M and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W5130M) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W5130MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
96-bit+50%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (FirePro W5130M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W5130MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W5130M) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W5130M) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureFirePro W5130MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder
VCE 2.0
NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder
UVD 4.2
NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W5130M draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5130M) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro W5130MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP
150W
70W-53%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
160mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
70-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
9.4
153.6+1534%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro W5130MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP
$169
Codename
Tropo
GA107
Release
October 2 2015
February 2 2024
Ranking
#783
#252

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.