FirePro W5130M vs Quadro 4000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W5130M vs Quadro 4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W5130M vs Quadro 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W5130M

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).

Quadro 4000

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 4000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.8% in PassMark G3D (1,475 vs 1,408), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W5130M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 4000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 4000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W5130M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W5130M vs Quadro 4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W5130M

The FirePro W5130M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,408 points.

Quadro 4000

The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W5130M scores 1,408 and the Quadro 4000 reaches 1,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5130M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro 4000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W5130M) vs 256 (Quadro 4000). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (FirePro W5130M) vs 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000).

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Quadro 4000
G3D Mark Score	1,408	1,475+5%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512+100%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9472 TFLOPS+95%	0.4864 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Quadro 4000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W5130M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 4000 carries 2 GB. FirePro W5130M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W5130M and 64-bit on the Quadro 4000. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W5130M) vs 512 KB (Quadro 4000) — the Quadro 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Quadro 4000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W5130M draws 150W versus the Quadro 4000's 142W — a 5.5% difference. The Quadro 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5130M) vs 350W (Quadro 4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Quadro 4000
TDP	150W	142W-5%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70	—
Perf/Watt	9.4	10.4+11%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is FirePro W5130M (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Quadro 4000
MSRP	—	$1199
Codename	Tropo	GF100
Release	October 2 2015	November 2 2010
Ranking	#783	#770

Search FirePro W5130M on Amazon

Search Quadro 4000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.