
FirePro W5130M vs Radeon HD 4870

FirePro W5130M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 4870
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W5130M is positioned at rank 14 and the Radeon HD 4870 is on rank 241, so the FirePro W5130M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5130M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4870
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The FirePro W5130M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The FirePro W5130M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4870 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W5130M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4870.
| Insight | FirePro W5130M | Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro W5130M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W5130M and Radeon HD 4870

FirePro W5130M
The FirePro W5130M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,408 points.

Radeon HD 4870
The Radeon HD 4870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,386 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W5130M scores 1,408 and the Radeon HD 4870 reaches 1,386 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5130M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 4870 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W5130M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4870). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (FirePro W5130M) vs 1.2 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4870).
| Feature | FirePro W5130M | Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,408+2% | 1,386 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 800+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9472 TFLOPS | 1.2 TFLOPS+27% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 160 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W5130M | Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W5130M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4870 has 2 GB. The FirePro W5130M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro W5130M | Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W5130M) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 4870).
| Feature | FirePro W5130M | Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | — |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W5130M draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 4870's 150W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 4870 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5130M) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4870). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro W5130M | Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4+2% | 9.2 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W5130M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro W5130M | Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $25 |
| Codename | Tropo | RV770 |
| Release | October 2 2015 | June 25 2008 |
| Ranking | #783 | #784 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












