FirePro W5130M vs Tesla M2090

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W5130M is positioned at rank 14 and the Tesla M2090 is on rank 379, so the FirePro W5130M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5130M

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

210%

#14

FirePro W5130M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

63%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

56%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2090

#363

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

26380%

#378

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

100%

#379

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

100%

#380

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

95%

#381

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

95%

#382

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

84%

#383

GRID P100-8Q

MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550

79%

#384

Quadro FX 550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

77%

#385

Quadro FX 350

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

77%

#386

GRID V100D-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

75%

#387

Tesla M2070

MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50

75%

#388

GRID M10-0Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

71%

#389

Quadro FX 560

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

68%

#390

GRID V100-2Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000

68%

#391

Quadro FX 5800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40

62%

#392

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

57%

#393

FireStream 9170

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20

57%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W5130M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2090.

Insight	FirePro W5130M	Tesla M2090
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (248mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro W5130M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro W5130M Benchmark Check

Tesla M2090 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W5130M and Tesla M2090

FirePro W5130M

The FirePro W5130M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,408 points.

Tesla M2090

The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W5130M scores 1,408 and the Tesla M2090 reaches 1,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5130M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W5130M) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (FirePro W5130M) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Tesla M2090
G3D Mark Score	1,408	1,400
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9472 TFLOPS	1.332 TFLOPS+41%
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	32	64+100%
L1 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Tesla M2090
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W5130M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2090 has 512 MB. The FirePro W5130M offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W5130M) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2090) — the Tesla M2090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Tesla M2090
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (FirePro W5130M) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (Tesla M2090). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Tesla M2090
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W5130M) vs CUDA,OpenCL (Tesla M2090).

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Tesla M2090
Encoder	VCE 2.0	—
Decoder	UVD 4.2	—
Codecs	H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1	CUDA,OpenCL

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W5130M draws 150W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 50% difference. The FirePro W5130M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5130M) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 248mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Tesla M2090
TDP	150W-40%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	248mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	70	—
Perf/Watt	9.4+68%	5.6