FirePro W5130M vs Tesla M2090

FirePro W5130M

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M2090

2011Core: 651 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W5130M vs Tesla M2090 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W5130M vs Tesla M2090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W5130M

2015

Why buy it

  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Tesla M2090

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W5130M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (1,408 vs 1,400), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W5130M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tesla M2090 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla M2090 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W5130M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W5130M vs Tesla M2090 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W5130M

The FirePro W5130M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,408 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla M2090

The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W5130M scores 1,408 and the Tesla M2090 reaches 1,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5130M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W5130M) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (FirePro W5130M) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).

FeatureFirePro W5130MTesla M2090
G3D Mark Score
1,408
1,400
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
512
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9472 TFLOPS
1.332 TFLOPS+41%
ROPs
16
48+200%
TMUs
32
64+100%
L1 Cache
0.13 MB
1 MB+669%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W5130MTesla M2090
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W5130M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2090 carries 512 MB. FirePro W5130M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W5130M and 64-bit on the Tesla M2090. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W5130M) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2090) — the Tesla M2090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W5130MTesla M2090
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (FirePro W5130M) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (Tesla M2090). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro W5130MTesla M2090
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W5130M) vs CUDA,OpenCL (Tesla M2090).

FeatureFirePro W5130MTesla M2090
Encoder
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1
CUDA,OpenCL
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W5130M draws 150W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 50% difference. The FirePro W5130M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5130M) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 248mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro W5130MTesla M2090
TDP
150W-40%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
248mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
9.4+68%
5.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is FirePro W5130M (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro W5130MTesla M2090
MSRP
$2500
Codename
Tropo
GF110
Release
October 2 2015
July 25 2011
Ranking
#783
#530

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.