FirePro W5130M vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W5130M is positioned at rank #14 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5130M

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

210%

#14

FirePro W5130M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

63%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

56%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W5130M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 640.

Insight	FirePro W5130M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro W5130M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro W5130M Benchmark Check

Iris Plus Graphics 640 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W5130M and Iris Plus Graphics 640

FirePro W5130M

The FirePro W5130M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,408 points.

Iris Plus Graphics 640

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W5130M scores 1,408 and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 reaches 1,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5130M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W5130M) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (FirePro W5130M) vs 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
G3D Mark Score	1,408+4%	1,353
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 9.5
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm++
Shading Units	512+33%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9472 TFLOPS+12%	0.8448 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	925 MHz	1100 MHz+19%
ROPs	16+167%	6
TMUs	32	48+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W5130M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 0 MB. The FirePro W5130M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (FirePro W5130M) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W5130M) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W5130M) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 640).

Feature	FirePro W5130M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Encoder	VCE 2.0	Quick Sync Video
Decoder	UVD 4.2	Quick Sync Video
Codecs	H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1	H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W5130M draws 150W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 640's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5130M) vs 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 80.