
FirePro W5130M
Popular choices:

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W5130M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro W5130M
2015Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
2018Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro W5130M better than Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U make more sense than FirePro W5130M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W5130M | Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W5130M | Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W5130M | Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W5130M | Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W5130M and Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

FirePro W5130M
FirePro W5130M
The FirePro W5130M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,408 points.


Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,348 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W5130M scores 1,408 and the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U reaches 1,348 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5130M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U uses Vega, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W5130M) vs 384 (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (FirePro W5130M) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro W5130M | Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,408+4% | 1,348 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9472 TFLOPS | 1.306 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1100 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W5130M | Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W5130M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U has 0 MB. The FirePro W5130M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro W5130M | Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W5130M draws 150W versus the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5130M) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FirePro W5130M | Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 15W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4 | 89.9+856% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro W5130M | Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | Tropo | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Release | October 2 2015 | January 7 2018 |
| Ranking | #783 | #831 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













