FirePro W7170M vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

FirePro W7170M

2015Core: 723 MHz

Popular choices:

VS

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

2015Core: 954 MHzBoost: 993 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro W7170M

2015

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro W7170M better than Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,605 vs 3,500 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro W7170M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W7170M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro W7170M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. FirePro W7170M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and you are getting 3.0% higher G3D Mark. Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 3,500 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro W7170MMaxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
1080p
low104 FPS77 FPS
medium89 FPS65 FPS
high73 FPS43 FPS
ultra43 FPS28 FPS
1440p
low91 FPS61 FPS
medium80 FPS51 FPS
high58 FPS31 FPS
ultra33 FPS19 FPS
4K
low29 FPS22 FPS
medium27 FPS21 FPS
high18 FPS13 FPS
ultra16 FPS11 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro W7170MMaxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
1080p
low96 FPS97 FPS
medium74 FPS68 FPS
high60 FPS49 FPS
ultra44 FPS31 FPS
1440p
low57 FPS53 FPS
medium40 FPS31 FPS
high31 FPS22 FPS
ultra23 FPS15 FPS
4K
low24 FPS18 FPS
medium17 FPS11 FPS
high13 FPS9 FPS
ultra10 FPS7 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro W7170MMaxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
1080p
low162 FPS158 FPS
medium130 FPS126 FPS
high108 FPS105 FPS
ultra81 FPS79 FPS
1440p
low122 FPS118 FPS
medium97 FPS94 FPS
high81 FPS79 FPS
ultra61 FPS59 FPS
4K
low81 FPS79 FPS
medium65 FPS63 FPS
high54 FPS52 FPS
ultra41 FPS39 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro W7170MMaxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
1080p
low162 FPS157 FPS
medium130 FPS126 FPS
high108 FPS105 FPS
ultra81 FPS79 FPS
1440p
low122 FPS110 FPS
medium97 FPS88 FPS
high81 FPS77 FPS
ultra61 FPS59 FPS
4K
low75 FPS64 FPS
medium58 FPS50 FPS
high47 FPS41 FPS
ultra31 FPS30 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7170M and Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

AMD

FirePro W7170M

The FirePro W7170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,605 points.

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7170M scores 3,605 and the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7170M is built on GCN 3.0 while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W7170M) vs 384 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)).

FeatureFirePro W7170MMaxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
G3D Mark Score
3,605+3%
3,500
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+433%
384

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W7170MMaxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7170M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) has 2 GB. The FirePro W7170M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureFirePro W7170MMaxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7170M) vs 12 (11_0) (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro W7170MMaxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,HEVC (FirePro W7170M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)).

FeatureFirePro W7170MMaxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Encoder
VCE 3.1
Decoder
UVD 6.0
NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,HEVC
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7170M draws 100W versus the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)'s 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7170M) vs 350W (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureFirePro W7170MMaxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
TDP
100W
30W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
36.0
116.7+224%