
FirePro W7170M
Popular choices:

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W7170M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro W7170M
2015Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro W7170M better than Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W7170M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 11 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W7170M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W7170M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 39 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W7170M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7170M and Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

FirePro W7170M
FirePro W7170M
The FirePro W7170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,605 points.
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7170M scores 3,605 and the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7170M is built on GCN 3.0 while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W7170M) vs 384 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)).
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,605+3% | 3,500 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7170M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) has 2 GB. The FirePro W7170M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7170M) vs 12 (11_0) (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,HEVC (FirePro W7170M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)).
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.1 | — |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,HEVC | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7170M draws 100W versus the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)'s 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7170M) vs 350W (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 30W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 36.0 | 116.7+224% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













