
Radeon Pro WX 4170

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro WX 4170
2016Why buy it
- ✅84.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 300W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $261 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4170 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌500% higher power demand at 300W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX 4170
The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,870 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 4170 scores 2,870 versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 921 — the Radeon Pro WX 4170 leads by 211.6%. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Boost clocks: 1201 MHz vs 2920 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4170 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,870+212% | 921 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 4096+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.46 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+1845% |
| Boost Clock | 1201 MHz | 2920 MHz+143% |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 64 | 256+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 8 MB+700% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4170 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4170 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E carries 512 MB. Radeon Pro WX 4170 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4170 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4170 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 8 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4170 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4170 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-83% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 57.4+1752% | 3.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 4170 came in at $400, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E was 65.3% cheaper ($261 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon Pro WX 4170 offers 9.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4170 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | $139-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2+9% | 6.6 |
| Codename | Baffin | Navi 48 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #526 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














