Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4170

2016Core: 1125 MHzBoost: 1201 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 4170

2016

Why buy it

  • 84.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 300W, a 250W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $261 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4170 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 500% higher power demand at 300W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 4170 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 84.9% in average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 211.6% in PassMark G3D (2,870 vs 921), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 14nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 4170 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $261 more expensive on MSRP at $400 vs $139, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 8.3% (7.2 vs 6.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 4170 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4170

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,870 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 4170 scores 2,870 versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 921 — the Radeon Pro WX 4170 leads by 211.6%. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Boost clocks: 1201 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4170Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
G3D Mark Score
2,870+212%
921
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Bristol Ridge
Process Node
14 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1024
4096+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.46 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS+1845%
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
2920 MHz+143%
ROPs
16
128+700%
TMUs
64
256+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB
8 MB+700%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4170Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E carries 512 MB. Radeon Pro WX 4170 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4170 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4170Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
1 MB
8 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4170Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
TDP
50W-83%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
57.4+1752%
3.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 4170 came in at $400, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E was 65.3% cheaper ($261 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon Pro WX 4170 offers 9.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4170Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP
$400
$139-65%
Performance per Dollar
7.2+9%
6.6
Codename
Baffin
Navi 48
Release
November 10 2016
July 23 2025
Ranking
#526
#23

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.