
FX-4170

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
FX-4170 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
FX-4170 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
FX-4170 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
FX-4170
2012Why buy it
- β Costs $292 less on MSRP ($157 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (3,121 vs 34,293).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 19.9 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($157 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- βOlder platform position on AM3+, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +297.6% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Delivers 284.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $157 MSRP).
- β Draws 120W instead of 125W, a 5W reduction.
- β Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM3+ and older memory support.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β186% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$157 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than FX-4170?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FX-4170 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-4170
The FX-4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011β2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,121 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The FX-4170 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the FX-4170 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D β a 15.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 4.2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The FX-4170 uses the Zambezi (2011β2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4170 scores 3,121 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 β a 166.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-4170 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | FX-4170 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB | 96 MB (total)+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+300% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 5 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Zambezi (2011β2012) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) |
| PassMark | 3,121 | 34,293+999% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-4170 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-4170 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-4170) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the FX-4170 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | FX-4170 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FX-4170 was priced at $157, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D came in at $449. On launch pricing ($157 vs $449), FX-4170 was $292 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-4170 delivers 19.9 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D β making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 117.4% better value option.
| Feature | FX-4170 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $157-65% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.9 | 76.4+284% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














