FX-4170
VS
Ryzen Embedded R1305G

FX-4170 vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G

AMD

FX-4170

4 Cores4 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2 Cores4 Thrd8 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-4170 is positioned at rank 796 and the Ryzen Embedded R1305G is on rank 856, so the FX-4170 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-4170

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15680%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14816%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10758%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3241%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2567%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2246%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1286%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1269%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1156%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1156%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1143%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1112%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1096%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1092%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1082%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
99%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
100%
#798
Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
99%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
99%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
99%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
98%
#803
Core i5-4460T
MSRP: $187|Avg: $30
98%
#804
Core i3-3220
MSRP: $117|Avg: $88
98%
#805
Core i7-3770T
MSRP: $278|Avg: $105
98%
#807
Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
97%
#808
Pentium G620
MSRP: $64|Avg: $12
97%
#809
Pentium G645T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded R1305G

#844
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1400%
#845
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1380%
#846
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1267%
#847
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1261%
#848
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1250%
#850
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1207%
#851
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1157%
#852
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1155%
#853
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1124%
#856
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
100%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded R1305G (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightFX-4170Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($23)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-4170 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightFX-4170Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+116%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($23)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-4170 and Ryzen Embedded R1305G

AMD

FX-4170

The FX-4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,121 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The FX-4170 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4170 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the FX-4170 versus 2.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G — a 42.3% clock advantage for the FX-4170 (base: 4.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The FX-4170 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4170 scores 3,121 against the Ryzen Embedded R1305G's 3,142 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1305G. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-4170 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

FeatureFX-4170Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+54%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
4.2 GHz+180%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+700%
512 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Zambezi (2011−2012)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
3,121
3,142
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-4170 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-4170Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Socket
AM3+
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-4170 launched at $157 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G debuted at $150. At current prices ($23 vs $50), the FX-4170 is $27 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-4170 delivers 135.7 pts/$ vs 62.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded R1305G — making the FX-4170 the 73.4% better value option.

FeatureFX-4170Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP
$157
$150-4%
Avg Price (30d)
$23-54%
$50
Performance per Dollar
135.7+116%
62.8
Release Date
2012
2020