FX-7500 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

AMD

FX-7500

4 Cores4 Thrd19 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019
Ryzen family
·······

FX-7500 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-7500 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-7500 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-7500

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $229 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • Draws 19W instead of 65W, a 46W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (3,209 vs 22,430).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +261.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Delivers 112.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 32.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 229% HIGHER MSRP
    $329 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • 242.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 19W.
  • No integrated graphics, while FX-7500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than FX-7500?
Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 261.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 599% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 261.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 599% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in 229.0% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 261.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 112.5% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 32.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-7500 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FX-7500

The FX-7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,209 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Processing Power

The FX-7500 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the FX-7500 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The FX-7500 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the FX-7500 scores 3,209 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 149.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X.

FeatureFX-7500Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
4.4 GHz+33%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz+71%
L3 Cache
32 MB
L2 Cache
4096 kB+700%
512K (per core)
Process
28 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-75%
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark
3,209
22,430+599%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-7500 uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the FX-7500 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (FX-7500) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureFX-7500Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket
FP3
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR4-3200+100%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
128 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
8
24+200%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (FX-7500) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The FX-7500 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: FX-7500 targets Mobile.

FeatureFX-7500Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-7500 was priced at $100, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($100 vs $329), FX-7500 was $229 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-7500 delivers 32.1 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 72% better value option.

FeatureFX-7500Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP
$100-70%
$329
Performance per Dollar
32.1
68.2+112%
Release Date
2014
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.