FX-8370 vs Ryzen 5 5600

AMD

FX-8370

8 Cores8 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
Ryzen family
·······

FX-8370 vs Ryzen 5 5600 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8370 vs Ryzen 5 5600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8370 vs Ryzen 5 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8370

2014

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (3,800 vs 11,077).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.1 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
    • 92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

    Ryzen 5 5600

    2022

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +65.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Delivers 248.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
    • Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
    • 20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than FX-8370?
    Yes. Ryzen 5 5600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 65.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 191.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 248.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 5600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 65.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 191.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen 5 5600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 5600 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $199 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you a 65.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 248.5% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 31.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen 5 5600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    FX-8370 vs Ryzen 5 5600 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    FX-8370

    The FX-8370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,184 points. Launch price was $199.

    AMD

    Ryzen 5 5600

    The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

    Processing Power

    The FX-8370 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the FX-8370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the FX-8370 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The FX-8370 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8370 scores 6,184 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 110.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 3,800 vs 11,077 (97.8% advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 520 vs 2,052, a 119.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,050 vs 8,600 (123% advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600).

    FeatureFX-8370Ryzen 5 5600
    Cores / Threads
    8 / 8+33%
    6 / 12
    Boost Clock
    4.3 GHz
    4.4 GHz+2%
    Base Clock
    4 GHz+14%
    3.5 GHz
    L3 Cache
    32 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    8192 kB+1500%
    512K (per core)
    Process
    32 nm
    7 nm-78%
    Architecture
    Vishera (2012−2015)
    Vermeer (2020−2025)
    PassMark
    6,184
    21,550+248%
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    3,800
    11,077+192%
    Geekbench 6 Single
    520
    2,052+295%
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    2,050
    8,600+320%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The FX-8370 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the FX-8370 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 — the Ryzen 5 5600 supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (FX-8370) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) — the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 970,990FX,990X (FX-8370) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).

    FeatureFX-8370Ryzen 5 5600
    Socket
    AM3+
    AM4
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 4.0+100%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1866
    DDR4-3200+71%
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    128 GB+300%
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    20
    24+20%
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: FX-8370 targets Legacy Gaming, Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: FX-8370 rivals Core i5-6400.

    FeatureFX-8370Ryzen 5 5600
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    Unlocked
    Yes
    Yes
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    Legacy Gaming
    Desktop
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the FX-8370 was priced at $199, while the Ryzen 5 5600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($199 vs $199), Ryzen 5 5600 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8370 delivers 31.1 pts/$ vs 108.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 110.8% better value option.

    FeatureFX-8370Ryzen 5 5600
    MSRP
    $199
    $199
    Performance per Dollar
    31.1
    108.3+248%
    Release Date
    2014
    2022

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.