CPU
GPU
FX-9830P
Athlon X4 840
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-9830P is positioned at rank 835 and the Athlon X4 840 is on rank 563, so the Athlon X4 840 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-9830P
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 840
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-9830P | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($45) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-9830P | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+82%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($45) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-9830P and Athlon X4 840
FX-9830P
The FX-9830P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon X4 840
The Athlon X4 840 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,331 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the FX-9830P and Athlon X4 840 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the FX-9830P versus 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 840 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 840 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The FX-9830P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon X4 840 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9830P scores 3,298 against the Athlon X4 840's 3,331 — a 1% lead for the Athlon X4 840.
| Feature | FX-9830P | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz+3% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per module) | 4 MB+300% |
| Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,298 | 3,331+1% |
Memory & Platform
The FX-9830P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X4 840 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-9830P | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Value Analysis
The FX-9830P launched at $150 MSRP, while the Athlon X4 840 debuted at $102. At current prices ($45 vs $25), the Athlon X4 840 is $20 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-9830P delivers 73.3 pts/$ vs 133.2 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 840 — making the Athlon X4 840 the 58.1% better value option.
| Feature | FX-9830P | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $102-32% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45 | $25-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.3 | 133.2+82% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on FX-9830P and Athlon X4 840
