FX-9830P vs Core i3-4360T
FX-9830P
Core i3-4360T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-9830P is positioned at rank 835 and the Core i3-4360T is on rank 709, so the Core i3-4360T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-9830P
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4360T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-9830P | Core i3-4360T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($45) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-9830P | Core i3-4360T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+12%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($45) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-9830P and Core i3-4360T
FX-9830P
The FX-9830P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i3-4360T
The Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,294 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The FX-9830P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4360T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9830P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the FX-9830P versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4360T — a 14.5% clock advantage for the FX-9830P (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The FX-9830P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4360T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9830P scores 3,298 against the Core i3-4360T's 3,294 — a 0.1% lead for the FX-9830P.
| Feature | FX-9830P | Core i3-4360T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per module)+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,298 | 3,294 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-9830P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4360T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-9830P | Core i3-4360T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-9830P) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4360T). The Core i3-4360T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-9830P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4360T targets Desktop.
| Feature | FX-9830P | Core i3-4360T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The FX-9830P launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core i3-4360T debuted at $138. At current prices ($45 vs $40), the Core i3-4360T is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-9830P delivers 73.3 pts/$ vs 82.3 pts/$ for the Core i3-4360T — making the Core i3-4360T the 11.6% better value option.
| Feature | FX-9830P | Core i3-4360T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $138-8% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45 | $40-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.3 | 82.3+12% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on FX-9830P and Core i3-4360T
