GeForce 770M vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce 770M

2013

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 675M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌3650% higher power demand at 75W vs 2W.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

2011

Why buy it

✅45.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 2W instead of 75W, a 73W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GeForce 770M

2013

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

2011

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅45.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 2W instead of 75W, a 73W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 675M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌3650% higher power demand at 75W vs 2W.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 675M SLI better than GeForce 770M?

Yes. GeForce GTX 675M SLI is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 45.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 2% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. It also comes from 2011 instead of 2013, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 770M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011 and a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 675M SLI is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 45.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.0% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce GTX 675M SLI is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce 770M still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

When does GeForce 770M make more sense than GeForce GTX 675M SLI?

Yes. GeForce 770M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 675M SLI. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 675M SLI currently gives you 2.0% higher G3D Mark and 45.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 770M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 675M SLI Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce 770M	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
1080p
low	31 FPS	77 FPS
medium	20 FPS	64 FPS
high	14 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	8 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	24 FPS	66 FPS
medium	14 FPS	54 FPS
high	7 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	24 FPS
4K
low	9 FPS	23 FPS
medium	6 FPS	22 FPS
high	4 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce 770M Open GeForce GTX 675M SLI

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce 770M	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
1080p
low	39 FPS	66 FPS
medium	19 FPS	44 FPS
high	14 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	9 FPS	20 FPS
1440p
low	20 FPS	37 FPS
medium	9 FPS	21 FPS
high	7 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	6 FPS	13 FPS
medium	3 FPS	8 FPS
high	3 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce 770M Open GeForce GTX 675M SLI

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce 770M	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
1080p
low	146 FPS	149 FPS
medium	117 FPS	119 FPS
high	97 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	74 FPS
1440p
low	110 FPS	112 FPS
medium	88 FPS	89 FPS
high	73 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	74 FPS
medium	58 FPS	60 FPS
high	49 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce 770M Open GeForce GTX 675M SLI

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce 770M	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
1080p
low	60 FPS	135 FPS
medium	49 FPS	107 FPS
high	39 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	72 FPS
1440p
low	36 FPS	100 FPS
medium	30 FPS	81 FPS
high	26 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	54 FPS
4K
low	24 FPS	58 FPS
medium	18 FPS	45 FPS
high	15 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	27 FPS

Open GeForce 770M Open GeForce GTX 675M SLI

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 770M and GeForce GTX 675M SLI

GeForce 770M

The GeForce 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,246 points. Launch price was $189.99.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 770M scores 3,246 and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 770M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 675M SLI uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 770M) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI).

Feature	GeForce 770M	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
G3D Mark Score	3,246	3,311+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	960+25%	768

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 770M	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 770M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 675M SLI has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce 770M	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (GeForce 770M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 770M	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
DirectX	11.1	12 (11_0)+8%
Vulkan	1.1	1.2+9%
OpenGL	4.6+15%	4.0
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1 (GeForce 770M) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 770M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 675M SLI).

Feature	GeForce 770M	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Encoder	NVENC 1	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 770M draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 675M SLI's 2W — a 189.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 770M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 92°C.