
GeForce 770M
Popular choices:

Iris Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce 770M
2013Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Iris Xe Graphics G7: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- β150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
- β More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019β2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce 770M
2013Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Iris Xe Graphics G7: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
- β More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019β2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- β150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Iris Xe Graphics G7 better than GeForce 770M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce 770M make more sense than Iris Xe Graphics G7?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce 770M | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce 770M | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce 770M | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce 770M | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 770M and Iris Xe Graphics G7

GeForce 770M
GeForce 770M
The GeForce 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,246 points. Launch price was $189.99.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 770M scores 3,246 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 770M is built on Kepler while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 770M) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce 770M | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,246 | 3,311+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+900% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 770M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce 770M | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 770M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 has 0 MB. The GeForce 770M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce 770M | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (GeForce 770M) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 770M | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12.1+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1 (GeForce 770M) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 770M) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce 770M | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 770M draws 75W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7's 30W β a 85.7% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 770M) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85Β°C vs 85Β°C.
| Feature | GeForce 770M | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 85Β°C | 85Β°C |
| Perf/Watt | 43.3 | 110.4+155% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 770M | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | β | $200 |
| Codename | GK106 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | May 30 2013 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #603 | #493 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













